The idea of the “New World,” in its history and contemporaneity, becomes an object of fascination and exploration.
Measuring the World captures a historical turning point, when European acquisition of knowledge about the world is undergoing a drastic change. The monks cannot figure out what Humboldt and his companion Bonpland want of them the abbot expresses his suspicion thusly: “nobody traveled half way around the world to measure land that didn’t even belong to him” (Kehlmann 58). Soon after his arrival, Humboldt visits a Christian mission, set up to baptize the natives. With permission from the offices of the Spanish colonial regime in Madrid, in 1799 Humboldt arrives in New Amsterdam, Trinidad, to begin what will be recorded in history as one of the most important explorations of all times. Humboldt’s quest for scientific knowledge would take him to the geographical “new” world. His passion for exactitude draws him to work on the law of quadratic reciprocity and the frequency of prime numbers: “At the base of physics were rules, at the base of rules there were laws, at the base of laws there were numbers” (Kehlmann 73). Suddenly confronted by a sea monster off the coast of Tenerife, for example, Humboldt’s reaction points not only to the absence of a capacity for wonder but perhaps also to the rationalist prejudices of German and European culture at the time: ‘He decided to write nothing about it’ (45).Daniel Kehlmann’s international bestseller Die Vermessung der Welt (2005 Measuring the World, 2007) narrates the quest for knowledge through the lives of two giants of the nineteenth century: the botanist and geographer Alexander von Humboldt, and the mathematician and physicist Carl Friedrich Gauss. The two surveyors of British North America even get a brief, most likely ironic, mention in the text.As far as magical realism is concerned, bizarre happenings or illogical breaks frequently cut across an otherwise matter-of-fact narrative, disrupting the neat categorisations of Enlightenment thinking and revealing the German characters’ inability to cope with phenomena that they cannot measure or explain scientifically. Without doubt, Kehlmann’s narrative is strongly reminiscent of Pynchon’s tale of the dour Charles Mason (in Die Vermessung, Humboldt is the killjoy), the licentious Jeremiah Dixon (Gauß in the German book), and their desire to give geometric expression to the Age of Reason by mapping the ‘new’ continent of America. Anderson pithily commented in The Nation: ‘Even more surprising: It has nothing to do with Hitler.’įrequent references in newspaper reviews to Thomas Pynchon’s Mason & Dixon (1997) and to Latin American magical realists such as Luis Borges, Alejo Carpentier, Gabriel García Márquez and Juan Rolfo confirm both the novel’s global reputation and the intertextual ambition of its author. (The previous honourable exception was Patrick Süskind’s Parfum from 1985.) As Mark M.
A book about two German historical figures, the explorer and naturalist Alexander von Humboldt (1769–1859) and the mathematician Johann Carl Friedrich Gauß (1777–1855), opening with their meeting in September 1828 at the seventh German Scientific Congress and then moving back in time to tell, in alternating chapters, of Humboldt’s travels to South America and central Asia and Gauß’s obsession with parallel lines and ‘curved space’, had seemingly demolished the truism that when it comes to German literature and international markets ‘only Nazis sell’. Following its release in 2005, it topped the German bestseller lists for over a year, sold more than a million copies by 2007, was translated into forty languages, and won a range of literary prizes, including the Candide Prize (2005), the Heimito-von-Doderer Prize (2006), and the Kleist Prize (2006). Yet Daniel Kehlmann’s Die Vermessung der Welt ( Measuring the World) was precisely that. Non-Euclidean geometry, number theory, and the eighteenth-century geological cult of Neptunism – these and other scientific obscurities scarcely seem to be the stuff of a novel destined to be a global hit.
0 kommentar(er)
